A fuzzy-based scoring rule for author ranking

The measurement of the quality of research has reached nowadays an increasing interest not only for scientific reasons but also for the critical problem of researchers’ ranking, due to the lack of grant assignments. The most commonly used approach is based on the so-called $h$-index, even if the current literature debated a lot about its pros and cons. This paper, after a brief review of the $h$-index and of alternative models, focuses on the characterization and the implementation of a modified scoring rule approach by means of a fuzzy inference system a lĂ  Sugeno.

Read Full: A fuzzy-based scoring rule for author ranking

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Welcome to PoliEcon.com, we compile papers from nep.repec.org. We hope to form an engaging and stimulating environment for those interested in economics and politics, and anything inbetween. Researchers, students, and laymen are all welcome. All posts link to a full version of the paper. I share my personal stuff at EconJive.com.
  • Categories

  • Recent Search Terms

  • My Personal Studies

  • Misleading Money Multiplier
  • Cause of Credit Bubbles
  • Macroeconomic Equilibrium, Fiscal, and Growth Model
  • Spending Multiplier Refutation
  • GDP Growth is Not Progress